GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 2021, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 46-61. https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2021.2-3
UDC 550.3 +581.1
Abstract References Full text (in English)
LABORATORY TESTS ABOUT RESISTIVITY VARIATION IN SOIL, IN CONNECTION WITH ROOT PRESENCE
© 2021 Y. Giambastiani(1,4,5), E. Guastini(2), F. Preti(2,5), G. Censini(3)
(1) CNR-IBE, Institute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council, Florence, Italy
(2) DAGRI, Department of Science and Technology of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
(3) GEORISORSE ITALIA SAS, Siena, Italy
(4) Bluebiloba Startup Innovativa SRL, Florence, Italy
(5) FORTECH – DAGRI Joint Laboratory – Innovative technologies for the sustainable forestry management, Florence, Italy
Abstract. Knowledge about root system distribution plays an important role in slope stability studies, as this factor grants an increase in soil geotechnical properties (cohesion and angle of friction) and determines a different underground water circulation. Published studies about in situ application of Electrical Resistivity Tomography analysis show how the root presence affects the measurable soil resistivity values, confirming the suitability to investigate the application of such technique, aiming to estimate root density in soil with an indirect and non-invasive method.
This study, laboratory-based and led on reconstructed samples in controlled condition, aims to find a correlation between the resistivity variations and the various factors that can affect them (humidity, bulk density, presence of foreign bodies).
The tests involved a clay-loam soil taken from Quaracchi (Florence, Italy), in an experimental fir-wood (Picea abies) owned by the Scuola di Agraria of Università degli Studi di Firenze, the first-chosen site for field applications of Electrical Resistivity Tomography. The soil has been dried out in a lab stove, sieved at 2 mm, and then placed in a Lexan box (30´20´20 cm), without compaction.
Inside the sample have been inserted 3 series of 4 iron electrodes, at three different depths. Resistivity measures are conducted on the three levels using a Syscal R2 with electrodes connected in a Wenner configuration. Root presence is simulated inserting 48 bamboo sticks (simple geometry, replicable root density). The tests were repeated in time, monitoring the natural variations in humidity (evapotranspiration) and bulk density (compaction).
The first results show an increase in resistivity with the decrease in mean soil humidity and increase in bulk density. Root presence, on equal terms, entails higher soil resistivity values whose trend appears, on first impression, to be fixed in an exponential law in relation to humidity.
Keywords: root density, geophysics, water content, indirect detection, electrical survey.
References
Aizebeokhai A.P., Olayinka A.I., Anomaly effects of orthogonal paired-arrays for 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging, Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 2141-2149. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1041-9
Alekseev I., Kostecki J., Abakumov E., Vertical electrical resistivity sounding (VERS) of tundra and forest tundra soils of Yamal region, International Agrophysics, 2017, vol. 31, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1515/intag-2016-0037
Amato M., Basso B., Celano G., Bitella G., Morelli G., Rossi R., In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging, Tree Physiology, 2008, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1441-1448. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/28.10.1441
Amato M., Rossi R., Bitella G., Lovelli S., Multielectrode geoelectrical tomography for the quantification of plant roots, Italian Journal of Agronomy, 2010, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 257-263. DOI: 10.4081/ija.2010.257
Attia al Hagrey S., Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity, J. Exp. Bot., 2007, vol. 58, pp. 839-854. DOI:10.1093/jxb/erl237
Batayneh A.T., Al-Diabat A.A., Application of a two-dimensional electrical tomography technique for investigating landslides along the Amman-Dead Sea highway, Jordan, Environmental Geology, 2002, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 399-403. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-002-0543-x
Bischetti G.B., Chiaradia E.A., Epis T., Morlotti E., Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps, Plant and Soil, 2009, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 71-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-9941-0
Cassiani G., Ursino N., Deiana R., Vignoli G., Boaga J., Rossi M., Perri M.T., Blaschek M., Duttmann R., Meyer S., Ludwig R., Soddu A., Dietrich P., Werban U., Noninvasive Monitoring of Soil Static Characteristics and Dynamic States: A Case Study Highlighting Vegetation Effects on Agricultural Land, Vadose Zone Journal, 2012, vol. 11, no. 3, Article ID: vzj2011.0195. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2011.0195
Chirico G.B., Borga M., Tarolli P., Rigon R., Preti F., Role of Vegetation on Slope Stability under Transient Unsaturated Conditions, Procedia Environ. Sci., 2013, vol. 19, pp. 932-941. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.103
Giambastiani Y., Preti F., Errico A., Sani L., On the tree stability: pulling tests and modelling to assess the root anchorage, Procedia Environ. Sci. Eng. Manag., 2017, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 207-218.
González-Ollauri A., Mickovski S.B., Hydrological effect of vegetation against shallow landslides: a technical approach, Geotech. Eng. Infrastruct. Dev., 2015, vol. 2, pp. 1753-1758, DOI: 10.1680/ecsmge.60678
Herman R., An introduction to electrical resistivity in geophysics, Am. J. Phys., 2001, vol. 69, pp. 943-952. DOI: 10.1119/1.1378013
Isaev V., Kotov P., Sergeev D., Technogenic Hazards of Russian North Railway, in Transportation Soil Engineering in Cold Regions, Singapore: Springer, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 311-320. DOI: 10.1007/
978-981-15-0450-1_32
Kaznacheev P.A., Popov I.Y., Modin I.N., Zhostkov R.A., Application of Independent Finite Element Modeling for Estimating the Effect of Simplest Landforms on Results of Inversion of Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data (Example of a Trench with the Triangular Cross-Section), Seismic Instruments, 2020, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 531-539. DOI: 10.3103/S0747923920050084
Kulikov V.A., Kaminsky A.E., Yakovlev A.G., Combined inversion of electric resistivity tomography and magnetotelluric sounding for solving tasks of ore geophysics, Geofizicheskie issledovaniya (Geophysical research), 2017, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 27-44. [In Russian]. DOI: 10.21455/gr2017.3-3
Lebedeva L.S., Bazhin K.I., Khristoforov I.I., Abramov A.A., Pavlova N.A., Efremov V.S., Ogone-rov V.V., Tarbeeva A.M., Fedorov M.P., Nesterova N.V., Makarieva O.M., Suprapermafrost subaerial taliks, central Yakutia, Shestakovka River basin, Earth’s Cryosph., 2019, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 40-50. DOI: 10.21782/KZ1560-7496-2019-140-50
Liese W., Anatomy and properties of bamboo, in Proceedings of the International Bamboo Workshop, 1985, pp. 196-208.
Mary B., Peruzzo L., Boaga J., Schmutz M., Wu Y., Hubbard S.S., Cassiani G., Small-scale characterization of vine plant root water uptake via 3-D electrical resistivity tomography and mise-à-la-masse method, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2018, vol. 22, pp. 5427-5444. DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-5427-2018
Morris W., Moreno E., Sagues A., Practical evaluation of resistivity of concrete in test cylinders using a Wenner array probe, Cement and Concrete Research, 1996, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 551-556.
Nassereddine M., Rizk J., Nasserddine G., Soil Resistivity Data Computations; Single and Two - Layer Soil Resistivity Structure and Its Implication on Earthing Design, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35-40. DOI: 10.1109/ciced.2018.
8592188
Nemtsova O., Zhurbin I., Zlobina A., Vector analysis of pole–pole array for determining the 3D boundary of object, Near Surface Geophysics, 2019, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 563-575. DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12065
Okpoli C., Sensitivity and Resolution Capacity of Electrode Configurations, Int. J. Geophys., 2013, Article ID: 608037, pp. 1-15.
Pozdnyakov A., Pozdnyakova L., Electrical fields and soil properties, in 17 World Congress of Soil Science, Symposium no. 53, Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures, 2002, paper no. 1558., pp. 1-11.
Preti F., Petrone A., Soil bio-engineering for watershed management and disaster mitigation in Ecuador: a short-term species suitability test, iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2013, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 95-99. DOI: 10.3832/ifor0636-006
Rao S., Lesparre N., Orozco A.F., Wagner F., Javaux M., Imaging plant responses to water deficit using electrical resistivity tomography, Plant and Soil, 2020, vol. 454, pp. 261-281. DOI: 10.1007/
s11104-020-04653-7
Reynolds J.M., An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, Wiley, 1997.
Robinson J.L., Slater L.D., Schäfer K.V.R., Evidence for spatial variability in hydraulic redistribution within an oak-pine forest from resistivity imaging, Journal of Hydrology, 2012, vol. 430-431, pp. 69-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.002.
Rossi R., Amato M., Bitella G., Bochicchio R., Ferreira Gomes J.J., Lovelli S., Martorella E., Favale P., Electrical resistivity tomography as a non-destructive method for mapping root biomass in an orchard, European Journal of Soil Science, 2011, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 206-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01329.x
Samouëlian A., Cousin I., Tabbagh A., Bruand A., Richard G., Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review, Soil Tillage Res., 2005, vol. 83, pp. 173-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004
Schwarz M., Cohen D., Or D., Root-soil mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2010, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.1029/2009JF001603
Simakov A., Vakulenko S., Politcina A., Ivanov P., Rusakov E., Marchenko M., Shustov N., Efficiency Evaluation of High-Resolution Seismic; Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Electromagnetic Surveys on Rivers, Based on Modelling Studies, in Engineering and Mining Geophysics. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2020, vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1-12.
Skvortsova E.B., Shein E.V., Abrosimov K.N., Gerke K.M., Korost D.V., Romanenko K.A., Belokhin V.S., Dembovetskii A.V., Tomography in soil science, Byulleten Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2016, vol. 86, pp. 28-34. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-131-146
Tiapkin O.K., Lozovyi A.L., Burlakova A.O., Pihulevskyi P.H., Geoinformation Support of Increase of Efficiency of Soil Cleaning from Petroleum Pollution, in 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1-5.
Zenone T., Morelli G., Teobaldelli M., Fischanger F., Matteucci M., Sordini M., Armani A., Ferrè C., Chiti T., Seufert G., Preliminary use of ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to study tree roots in pine forests and poplar plantations, Functional Plant Biology, 2008, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1047-1058. DOI: 10.1071/FP08062