GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 20-36. DOI: 10.21455/gr2017.1-2
UDC 550.34.013.2
Abstract References Full text (in Russian)
TIME AND ENERGETIC PARAMETERS OF THE AFTERSHOCK PROCESS FOR THE EARTHQUAKES IN THE CAUCASUS AND ADJACENT AREAS
© 2017 A.I. Lutikov(1,2), G.Yu. Dontsova(2), S.N. Rodina(1)
(1) Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
(2) Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Abstract. Based on the analysis of aftershock sequences of 23 strong and moderate (5.1≤MW≤7.1) earthquakes of the Caucasus and adjacent areas, the duration of the aftershock process Taft and the total scalar seismic moment M0aft released during it were estimated. Parameters M0aft и Taft were selected according to the criteria proposed and were used in the development of the regression relationships. The significant correlation between these parameters and the moment magnitude of the main shock was revealed. The empirical Bath’s law was tested for the set of the earthquakes considered and demonstrated its validity on average. However, the difference between the magnitudes of the main shock and the strongest aftershock ΔM is significant; if the double events are excluded, 0.4≤DM≤1.8.
Earlier, in 2013, we conducted the similar study for the earthquakes in the Kurile-Kamchatka region. The results obtained for two seismically active regions lead to the conclusion that relative intensity and duration of the aftershock process are inversely proportional to seismic activity of the territory considered, which means that relaxation processes accompanying strong seismic events display longer duration and higher intensity in the regions of lower seismic activity.
This conclusion can be regarded as preliminary because it should be tested for other seismically active regions.
Keywords: earthquakes, aftershock sequences, scalar seismic moment, duration of the aftershock process, the Caucasus.
References
Andreeva M.Y., Levin B.W., and Sasorova E.V. Peculiarities of the with in year distribution of earthquakes in the Kuril region, Russian Journal of Pacific Geology, 2009, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 491-500.
Arefiev S.S., Epitsentral’nye seismologicheskie issledovaniya (Epicentral Seismological Studies), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003.
Arefiev S.S., Bykova V.V., and Vakarchuk R.N., Source model of the Central Caucasus earthquake, September 7, 2009, Geophys. Research, 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33-46.
Baranov S.V. and Gabsatarova I.P. The aftershock processes of strong earthquakes in the Western Caucasus, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no.3, pp. 448-458.
Baranov S.V. and Chebrov D.V. Modeling and forecasting the aftershock processes in Kamchatka, Izv. Physics of the Solid Earth, 2012, vol. 48, no. 11-12, pp. 817-828.
Bath M. Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle, Tectonophysics, 1965, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 483-514.
Dagestanskoe zemletryasenie 14 maya 1970 g. (Dagestan earthquake of May 14, 1970), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.
Dziewonski A.M., Chou T.A., and Woodhouse J.H. Determination of earthquake source parameters from wave-form data for studies of global and regional seismicity, J. Geophys. Res., 1981, vol. 86, pp. 2825-2852.
Fedotov S.A., Chernyshev S.D., Chernysheva G.V., and Vikulin A.V. Determination of the boundaries of earthquakes sources with M³7 3/4, peculiarities of seismic cycle and long-term seismic prediction for the Kurile-Kamchatka arc, Volcanol. Seismol., 1980, no. 6, pp. 52-67.
Gardner J.K.and Knopoff L. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 1974, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1363–1367.
Kanamori H. The energy release of great earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 1977, vol. 82, pp. 2981-2987.
Kisslenger C. and Jones L.M. Properties of aftershock sequences in southern California, J. Geophys. Res., 1991, vol. 96, pp. 11947-11958.
Lutikov A.I. and Dontsova G. Yu. Estimation of linear dimensions of Kamchatka earthquake sources from the dimensions of the aftershock region, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2002, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 469-484.
Lutikov A.I. Preliminary analysis of the aftershock process of April 20, 2006 Olyutora earthquake in Koryakiya, in Olyutorskoe zemletryasenie (20 (21) aprelya 2006 g., Koryakskoe nagor’e). Pervye rezul’taty issledovanii (The Olyutora Earthquake of April 20(21), 2006, Koryak Plateau), Chebrov, V.N., Ed., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: GS RAN, 2007, pp. 241-250.
Lutikov A.I. and Rodina S.N. Temporal and power parameters of aftershock process of the Kuriles-Kamchatka earthquakes, Geophys. Research, 2013, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 5-17.
Lutikov A.I. and Gabsatarova I.P. Relationship between moment magnitude Mw and surface wave magnitude Ms for the Caucasus region and adjacent areas, Geophys. Research, 2016, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29-36.
Molchan G.M. and Dmitrieva O.E., Identifying the aftershocks: a review and new approaches, in Vychislitel’naya seismologiya. Vyp. 24 (Computational Seismology, vol. 24), Moscow, 1991, pp. 19-50.
Molchan G.M. and Dmitrieva O. Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches, Geophys. J. Inter., 1992, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 501-516.
Novyi katalog sil’nykh zemletryasenii na territorii SSSR s drevneishikh vremen do 1975 g (New Catalog of Strong Earthquakes in the USSR from Ancient Time to 1975), ed. N. V. Kondorskaya and N. V. Shebalin, Moscow: Nauka, 1977.
Omori F. On the aftershocks of earthquake, J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo, 1894, vol. 7, pp. 111-200.
Prozorov A.G. Remote aftershocks - precursors of earthquakes in Southern California, Vychislitel’naya seismologiya. Vyp. 14 (Computational Seismology, vol. 14), Moscow, 1982, pp. 20-26.
Prozorov A.G., Dynamical algorithm for identifying the aftershocks for the world earthquake catalog, Vychislitel’naya seismologiya. Vyp. 19 (Computational Seismology, vol. 19), Moscow, 1986, pp. 58-62.
Rautian T.G. The energy of earthquakes. Methods of detailed study of seismicity, Trudy IFZ AN SSSR, 1960, vol. 176, no. 9, Moscow, pp. 75-114.
Radziminovich N.A. and Ochkovskaya M.G., G. Identification of earthquake aftershock and swarm sequences in the Baikal rift zone, Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2013, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 169-186.
Reasenberg P. Secondorder moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1985, vol. 90 (B7), pp. 5479-5495.
Riznichenko Yu.V. Problemy seismologii (Problems of Seismology), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
Rodkin M.V. and Tikhonov I.N. Megaearthquake of March 11, 2011 in Japan: earthquake’s siae and aftershock sequence behavior, Geophys. processes and biosphere, 2011, vol.10, no. 1, pp. 64-80.
Rogozhin E.A. Ocherki regional’noi seismotektoniki (Essays on Regional Seismotectonics), Moscow: IFZ, 2012.
Rogozhin E.A., Lutikov A.I., Ovsyuchenko A.N., Dontsova G.Yu., Kuchay M.S., and Rodina S.N. Experience of detailed seismic zoning of North Caucasus, Prirodnye i technogennye riski. Bezopasnost sooruzhenii, 2013, no. 4, pp. 38-42.
Rogozhin E.A., Lutikov A.I., Sobisevich L.E., Shen T., and Kanonidi K.K. The Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015 in Nepal: Tectonic position, aftershock process, and possibilities of forecasting the evolution of seismic situation, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2016, vol. 52, no.http://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=1667182&selid=27106610 4, pp. 534-549.
Saltykov V.A. and Kravchenko N.M. Parameters of Kamchatka seismicity in 2008, Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2010, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 186-196.
Sherbakov R. and Turcotte D.L. A modified form of bath’s law, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 2004, vol. 94, pp. 1968-1975.
Smirnov V.B. Prognostic anomalies of seismic regime and technique for preparation of original data, Geophys. Research, 2009, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 7-22.
Smirnov V.B. and Gabsatarova I.P. Representativeness of the earthquake catalogue for the North Caucasus: calculation data and statistical estimates, Vestnik OGGGGN RAN, 2000, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 83-95.
Utsu T.A. Statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks, Geophysical Magazine, 1961, vol. 30, pp. 521-605.
Yunga S.L. Metody i rezul’taty izycheniya seismotektonicheskikh deformatsii (Seismotectonic Deformations: Methods and Results of Study), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1963 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1963), Moscow: Nauka, 1966, pp. 19-32.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1966 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1966), Moscow: Nauka, 1970, pp. 19-31.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1970 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1970), Moscow: Nauka, 1973, pp. 19-27.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1971 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1971), Moscow: Nauka, 1975, pp. 24-28.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1976 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1976), Moscow: Nauka, 1980 pp. 127-137.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1978 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1978), Moscow: Nauka, 1982, pp. 101-109.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1981 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1981), Moscow: Nauka, 1984, pp. 140-146.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1983 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1983), Moscow: Nauka, 1986, pp. 168-179.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1986 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1986), Moscow: Nauka, 1989, pp. 227-240.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1988 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1988), Moscow: Nauka, 1991, pp. 236-247.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1989 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1989), Moscow: Nauka, 1993, pp. 255-273.
Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1991 godu (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1991), Moscow: OIFZ RAN, 1997, pp. 110-114.
Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii v 1992 godu (Earthquakes in the Northern Eurasia in 1992), Moscow: OIFZ RAN, 1997, pp. 139-150.
Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii v 1999 godu (Earthquakes in the Northern Eurasia in 1999), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2005.
Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii v 2006 godu (Earthquakes in the Northern Eurasia in 2006), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2012.
Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii v 2008 godu (Earthquakes in the Northern Eurasia in 2008), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2014.
Zemletryaseniya Rossii v 2009 godu (Earthquakes in Russia in 2009), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2011.
Zemletryaseniya Rossii v 2011 godu (Earthquakes in Russia in 2011), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2013.
Zemletryaseniya Rossii v 2012 godu (Earthquakes in Russia in 2012), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2014.